Two weeks ago, Project Stargate, a massive, high-profile joint venture, was announced by US President Donald Trump that aims to revolutionize the United Statesโ€™ AI infrastructure.

France and the EU have matched this announcement with equivalently large undertakings. I would like to unpack these announcements. What is it? Where does the money come from? And, whatโ€™s the spending plan? Plus, I might comment here and there.

Meanwhile, China is not announcing much but focuses on AI.

The further I got in my research the more frustrated I became. ๐Ÿ™Š

I share my learnings with you, and keep you updated on AI/ how to build best with AI, as new tools/ AI will be launched.

I am launching the updated online course: Everyone can Code!โœจ (Updated, because it keeps valuable lessons on working with AI, but has a chapter that I update constantly.)

๐ŸšจSpecial DEAL: Get a yearly Premium Subscription to this newsletter and receive the course Everyone can Code!โœจfor free!๐Ÿšจ (Together worth 200 โ‚ฌ)

(You will be emailed with the course entry. Current Premium subscribers will get access to the course automatically.)

Big Bets on AI - The US, France, and the EU

Stargate in the US

What is it?

Stargate involves developing expansive data centers and associated energy systems to power AI.

Where does the money come from?

The funding is sourced from private-sector investments by key partners: OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank are the primary backers, with additional capital from investment firm MGX and other limited partners. The initial commitment is about US$100โ€ฏbillion, with plans to eventually invest up to US$500โ€ฏbillion over the next four years.

Where should the money be invested?

The investment is for building and expanding AI data centers (with the first major site in Abilene, Texas) and upgrading the necessary energy infrastructureโ€”such as power plants and related facilitiesโ€”to meet the high energy demands of these centers.

Franceโ€™s โ‚ฌ109 billion AI investment

What is it?

A massive โ‚ฌ109 billion investment package to push AI in the coming years was announced by President Emmanuel Macron at the Paris AI Action Summit.

Where does the money come from?

Most of the โ‚ฌ109 billion comes from private and foreign investors, with the UAE contributing up to โ‚ฌ50 billion, followed by Brookfield (โ‚ฌ20 billion), Bpifrance (โ‚ฌ10 billion), and others. The French government coordinates and offers incentives, but contributes only a tiny portion directly.

I have comments to governments coordinating the investments further below, after the EU plan. Positively, France is not spending any (taxpayer) money directly.

Where should the money be invested?

Most of it will fund new data centers and supercomputers. The UAE, Brookfield and other contributors will get their pole position: a mega data campus (1โ€ฏGW capacity) will be built under a French-Emirati alliance; Brookfield will expand data-center giant Data4; Digital Realty and Equinix plan multi-billion-euro expansions. FluidStack is erecting a nuclear-powered supercomputer, and Mistral AI is building Europeโ€™s largest AI cluster.

The French government seems to have chosen Mistral AI as their national AI champion.

The goal is bold: โ€œmatch or exceed US and Chinese compute powerโ€

Even though these are significant steps, I doubt they can match the pace of the US and China. They are too far ahead and too determined to push even further. Letโ€™s be real; France alone can not match or exceed. (See comparison table below.)

Quick plug:

Make Mealtime Easy with Huel

  • Packed with 40g of protein & 27 essential nutrients

  • Fast & convenient for the busiest days

  • 8 delicious flavors including Chocolate, Cookies & Cream, and Coffee Caramel

  • Get 15% off your first order, plus a free t-shirt and shaker with code BEHUEL15

(โœจ If you donโ€™t want ads like these, Premium is the solution. It is like you are buying me a Starbucks Iced Honey Apple Almondmilk Flat White a month.)

European Union's โ‚ฌ200โ€ฏBillion AI Investment Plan

What is it?

President Ursula von der Leyen announced the plan to mobilize โ‚ฌ200โ€ฏbillion for AI for the EU region. This initiative is unprecedented in scale for Europe. The plan, dubbed InvestAI, is combining funding from EU institutions, member states, and industry.

Where does the money come from?

Roughly โ‚ฌ150โ€ฏbillion in private-sector commitments and ~โ‚ฌ50โ€ฏbillion in public financing via the European Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB).

While thereโ€™s a nice chunk from the private sector, I think the roughly โ‚ฌ50 billion from public financing is wrong. Governments are known to be bad at investing money. Pouring this amount into AI will lead to huge waste (as history shows), and this gives socialist vibes. Making it easier to unlock risk capital from real institutions is key to actual progress while reducing regulatory hurdles.

Where should the money be invested?

  • Building 4 AI gigafactories with 100k+ top GPUs โ†’ for training models

  • Venture funding, equity co-investments, and innovation grants to help AI companies grow inside the EU (rather than relocating to the US).

  • AI adoption in the industry

  • Supporting โ€œCommon European Data Spacesโ€ (shared datasets under GDPR rules) and expanding cloud/edge projects (e.g. GAIA-X) to give European AI teams robust local infrastructure.

The EU sees itself as an orchestration layer. I donโ€™t think that works out well.โ†’ remove hurdles and drive growth with the right incentives, but donโ€™t manage the money!

As a government, you shouldnโ€™t interfere(โ€œhere is money, make an awesome productโ€ without actually winning in a real market). In fact, you should remove yourself as much as possible so actors can innovate in an internationally competitive environment.

Ground rules must be established, donโ€™t get me wrong. But looking at the current non-well-co-organized regulatory landscape of IT, digital, AI, and tech regulations, we are way past ground rules.

Letโ€™s assume, we want to build AI in healthcare.

For a typical EU AI project, you have to deal with 11 major regulatory frameworks. In detail, these include the AI Act, GDPR, Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, Cybersecurity Act, NIS2 Directive, Competition Law, Copyright/IP rules, ethical/transparency guidelines, plus the two healthcareโ€specific rules (MDR and IVDR).

Collectively, these frameworks break down into roughly 150โ€“200 distinct sub regulatory provisions you must comply with. (In reality, there is even more.)

If you donโ€™t comply, fines are coming:

  • For the EU AI Act, up to โ‚ฌ35 million or 7% of global annual turnover (whichever is higher)โ€‹

  • For GDPR, up to โ‚ฌ20 million or 4% of global annual turnover (whichever is higher)โ€‹

  • For the Digital Service Act, up to 6% of global annual turnover (whichever is higher)โ€‹

  • For DMA, up to 10% of global annual turnover

  • NIS2 Directive, up to โ‚ฌ10 million or 2% of global annual turnover (whichever is higher)โ€‹

  • Competition Law, 10% of global annual turnover

  • Copyright infringements, MDR, and IVDR, open ceiling. Product recalls, bans, and potential bankruptcy.

While these regulations all make sense from their point of view, there is no harmonization between them. This is the biggest problem, according to lawyers and data protection officers I talked to at this yearโ€™s CISOx conference in Munich.

No harmonization leads to contradicting rules at times. It leads to an unclear regulatory environment. Expert teams need to be hired. And, ultimately, hinders risk capital, innovation, and bold bets.

I listened to Ursula von der Leyenโ€™s speech. While I like the enthusiasm around moving forward in AI within the EU, I think it was delusional. She pointed out that the EU is not behind in AI.

The contrary is the case (Am I too pessimistic? Let me know.):

Dimension

US (341 m ppl)

EU (448m ppl)

Share of Global Data Center Capacity1

37% (hyperscale capacity.)

18%

Industrial Electricity Cost2

$0.06 per kWh

$0.18 per kWh

Share Global AI Patents3

21% (2nd after China)

2.5% (collective EU)

AI Models in top 25 (today)4

22 models

0 (niente, nada)

Comprehensive Regulations Tech/ AI

3 major,
75 sub reg. (and better harmonized)

11 major,
200 sub reg. (from above)

Private AI investments in 20245

$25 B

$6 B

Share of global AI startup funding6

61% (of global AI funding)

6%

This is by no means a comprehensive list. Other factors like talent, AI adoption, etc., are also in favor of the US.

Last fact: 16 years ago the US market capitalisation was equal to the one from the EU. Today, it is 3:1.

So, to say that the EU wants to โ€œmatch or exceed US and Chineseโ€ in anything AI-related is delusional.

We (I am a proud European, and very much enjoy my live here, in Germany) made the first step, but I pray that the EU governments donโ€™t repeat socialistic money management, leading to money wasting rather than wealth generation.

Fact-based news without bias awaits. Make 1440 your choice today.

Overwhelmed by biased news? Cut through the clutter and get straight facts with your daily 1440 digest. From politics to sports, join millions who start their day informed.

(โœจ If you donโ€™t want ads like these, Premium is the solution. It is like you are buying me a Starbucks Iced Honey Apple Almondmilk Flat White a month.)

I hope you enjoyed it.

Happy weekend!
Martin ๐Ÿ™‡

Our webpage

You might like our last episodes: