- Generative AI - Short & Sweet
- Posts
- AI's Billion-Dollar Bids & Brute-Force Bets
AI's Billion-Dollar Bids & Brute-Force Bets
Zuck is on a warpath
[Tomorrow for Premium subs: The AI Millionaire Boom in the next 5 years.]
Dear fellow AI enthusiasts,
I was scrolling through Polymarket1 the other day—it's a prediction market where you can bet on almost anything—and a particular question caught my eye:
“Which company has the best AI model by the end of July?”
And I am like: no-brainer, xAI with Grok 4!
Then, I saw this:

So, I was confused when I saw Google clearly dominating the bet. But then I looked at how they’re evaluating it: the https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text. And that’s where the nuance comes in.
It wasn’t about raw intelligence.
Time to change compliance forever.
We’re thrilled to announce our $32M Series A at a $300M valuation, led by Insight Partners!
Delve is shaping the future of GRC with an AI-native approach that cuts busywork and saves teams hundreds of hours. Startups like Lovable, Bland, and Browser trust our AI to get compliant—fast.
To celebrate, we’re giving back with 3 limited-time offers:
$15,000 referral bonus if you refer a founding engineer we hire
$2,000 off compliance setup for new customers – claim here
A custom Delve doormat for anyone who reposts + comments on our LinkedIn post (while supplies last!)
Thank you for your support—this is just the beginning.
👉️ Get started with Delve
(✨ If you don’t want ads like these, Premium is the solution. It is like you are buying me a Starbucks Iced Honey Apple Almondmilk Flat White a month.)
xAI’s Grok is arguably the model with the highest raw intelligence, especially for scientific and STEM tasks. But as I’ve mentioned before, it’s not yet packaged into a perfectly polished AI product like Google’s Gemini is, but also ChatGPT. To be honest, I also see OpenAI as much stronger than the 2% reflected in this bet.
The discrepancy between the leaderboard and perceived power is huge.

But xAI is committed to closing that gap fast. They are one of the youngest players in the foundation model game and are already planning infinite image and video generation with sound.
The key takeaway is this: the Polymarket score is as much about AI product engineering as it is about pure intelligence.
Quick Hits from the Polymarket Rabbit Hole
BTW, Polymarket is a rabbithole of strong signals. Here are a few others I’m watching:
Will Solana hit a new ATH ($295) before 2026?
Yes: 27%. This tests the bull strength in the DeFi and GameFi sectors.
Israel-Hamas ceasefire before 2026?
Yes: 80%. Geopolitical stability here could have an indirect, positive impact on the tech world, especially for semiconductors.
Will the US enter a recession in 2025?
Yes: 22% (down from 66%!). The soft landing narrative seems to be winning, which is a boost for tech stocks, as recessions hit AI funding hard.
The AI Arms Race: Two Strategies
How are the big players planning to win? We're seeing two wildly different—and equally insane—strategies emerge.
1. xAI’s Brute Force Compute
xAI is scaling its work to brute force its way to raw, crazy intelligence with its Colossus data centers.
Colossus One: ~$230,000 GPUs.
Colossus Two: >550,000 GPUs, likely using NVIDIA's next-gen GB200/GB300 models.
Supporting Infrastructure: Over 1 exabyte of storage and Tesla Megapacks to smooth out the power grid.
This is the largest publicly known AI compute cluster, and xAI has ambitions to scale it far BEYOND a million GPUs by early 2026.
2. Meta’s Money Cannon
While xAI builds hardware, Meta is buying talent. You might have heard about the crazy amount of money the Facebook/Instagram ad machine is using to poach generational talent from places like OpenAI.
And it doesn’t stop there. According to Wired, Zuckerberg and Meta have approached over a dozen employees at ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati's new venture, Thinking Machines Lab, offering massive compensation packages.

How massive? They offered John Schulman, a co-founder of the lab, a package reportedly exceeding:
ONE F**KING BILLION DOLLARS!
He rejected it. The reason? A reported mismatch in leadership, culture, and a fundamental divergence in vision from the core ethos of Thinking Machines Lab.
I thought naming Shengjia Zhao as chief scientist might be the final bow on the Meta Superintelligence (MSL) team, but clearly, Zuck isn’t stopping his pursuit of top AI talent at any cost.
And boy, is Meta on fire. Zuck recently spoke about having superintelligence in sight, seeing glimpses of self-improving AI, and a path to automating all valuable work.
Today Mark shared Meta’s vision for the future of personal superintelligence for everyone.
Read his full letter here: meta.com/superintellige…— AI at Meta (@AIatMeta)
1:06 PM • Jul 30, 2025
Don't Sleep on Google
And lastly, don’t sleep on Google DeepMind. AlphaEvolve is a masterpiece. [last episode]
They just launched AlphaEarth for climate prediction, and many people completely missed AlphaChip, which has transformed computer chip design.
This is all on top of the entire Alpha series of models they continue to build.
Exciting times ahead.
I hope you enjoyed it.
Happy weekend!
🙇
I recommend:
Beehiiv if you write newsletters.
Superhuman if you write a lot of emails.
Cursor if you code a lot.
Bolt.new for full-stack development.
Follow me on X.com.
AI for your org: We build custom AI solutions for half the market price and time (building with AI Agents). Contact us to know more.
1 Side note: Polymarket often reflects reality with surprising accuracy, simply by letting highly informed people put their money where their mouths are.